AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Mountain tanks4/3/2023 Conventional military platforms like tanks, infantry fighting vehicles (IFV), self propelled artillery etc. There are various challenges in operating at high altitudes. Challenges in operating at high altitudes In the extreme high altitudes of Ladakh, it is very difficult to operate medium tanks, like T-72 and T-90, or heavy/ Main Battle Tanks like Arjun Mk1/Arjun Mk2 which were neither built nor equipped to handle the harsh conditions. Light tanks have got renewed focus and interest in recent times, primarily due to flaring security situations in remote and inaccessible areas ( like 2020-2022 India China skirmishes). It was designed to provide the Indian Army with the versatility to execute operations in varying terrain against diverse threats and equipment profiles of its adversaries. It is a cross between an armoured fighting vehicle and an Indian light tank (AFV-ILT), with a high power-to-weight ratio and substantial firepower, protection, surveillance and communication capabilities. The Zorawar ( Punjabi: ਜ਼ੋਰਾਵਰ, lit.'brave and strong') is an Indian tank. Defence Research and Development Organisation.Please introduce links to this page from related articles try the Find link tool for suggestions. It’s now a major residential area,” he noted.This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. “When these tanks were put here in 1953, this was not a residential area at all. He said he has major concerns about the risk of fire and spillover during an earthquake that would threaten residents in the area. Robinson used the press conference to call for an independent analysis of the six 1953-built tanks. “Earthquakes are notorious for producing sloshing of the contents of the tanks … the material begins to slosh almost uncontrollably inside the tank.” That movement exerts an independent force on the tanks “that can cause them to fail if they haven’t been properly designed,” he said. The geologist underlined the risk the “sloshing” effect could have on the tanks. “It’s maybe, arguably a low-probability event, but the vulnerability, the consequences are enormous,” he said. “There’s nothing there.”Ĭlague said a major earthquake with an epicentre near Vancouver is unlikely. “In no way did they analyze these tanks for failure,” he said. “The report identifies how the probabilities and consequences from tank failures during seismic events are quantified and combined mathematically to establish individual risk contours around Burnaby Terminal, and to assess the adequacy of secondary containment,” the spokesperson wrote.īut Dunnet said that report “represents nothing structural.” The company filed a report to the National Energy Board, detailing its risk assessment undertakings, according to the spokesperson. Trans Mountain – now a Crown corporation after the federal government purchased the existing infrastructure and expansion project from Kinder Morgan – has emergency response technicians, 24/7 monitoring for fires and a sprinkler system, according to its spokesperson. Although tank fires and seismic tank incidents worldwide are extremely rare, our prevention and emergency management programs are an integral part of keeping our terminals operating safely,” the spokesperson wrote. “In 65 years of operation, we’ve never had a storage tank fire or structural incident with one of our tanks. In an emailed statement, a Trans Mountain spokesperson touted the company’s safety record. “The serious risk is right now,” he said. While many people have raised concerns about the risks associated with the proposed expansion of the Trans Mountain pipeline – which would add 14 new tanks to the Burnaby Mountain site – Dunnet said the existing infrastructure already poses a serious safety concern to the 30,000 people who live within two kilometres of the tank farm. They were built to outdated standards without considerations made for lateral pressure from seismic or wind forces, Dunnet said. The six tanks in question were built in 1953 and have moveable roofs that float on top of the oil. While the company has published a report detailing how the tanks walls would withstand the ground-shaking forces during a quake, it does not take into account the force of sloshing oil within the tank. Trans Mountain is defending its emergency preparedness after a politician, engineer, activist and geologist stood outside its Burnaby Mountain tank farm to accuse the pipeline company of potentially endangering thousands of lives in the event of a major earthquake.īurnaby North-Seymour federal NDP candidate Svend Robinson held a press conference Tuesday alongside Simon Fraser University geology professor John Clague, structural engineer Gordon Dunnet and anti-pipeline activist Karl Perrin.ĭunnet said existing Trans Mountain tanks could fail to hold their contents during an earthquake.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |